WTC Conspiracy theory

After 7 years of the so called 9 /11 attacks on WTC or the twin towers, which destroyed the edifice of US economy, conspiracy theories are gaining ground   All the evidence put forward by the structural engineers, demolition experts, electricity outage exercise, security personnel, press coverage, previous building fires track record, etc all points to the fact that World trade centre was pulled down under orders   The buildings were triggered or weakened to collapse under its own weight not causing any collateral damage  I had visited the conspiracy theory some years back but dismissed it as a money making or publicity stunt perpetuated by critics of the Bush Government 

Now with increased visual evidence and collaborative studies it is impossible to ignore the hardcore facts  

 IF YOU BECOME AWARE OF LIE AND DO NOTHING TO EXPOSE THE LIE, YOU THEN BECOME A PART OF THE LIE “ 

So I thought I will never become a part of the make believe collapse, the buildings were designed to survive a fully fuel loaded 707 Boeing aircraft   As per experts a plane crashing into WTC would have caused only membrane damage like a pencil breaking through a wire mesh  

The evidence of the conspiracy theory has been beautifully captured in the following links please visit to have a first hand knowledge:

1)   http://in youtube com/watch?v=CNskClIyGfY& amp;feature=related

2)    http://in youtube com/watch?v=HG4TzCtljHQ& amp;feature=related

3)   http://in youtube com/watch?v=5qNouhEo4V0& amp;feature=related  

4)   http://in youtube com/watch?v=iB0uxfnwgm0& amp;feature=related  

5)   http://in youtube com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60& amp;feature=related  

The building was literally being prepared for demolition will be an understatement as per conspiracy theory   The electricity departments were conducting power shutdown exercise at least a fortnight in advance, 34 the floor of the building was totally vacated, being the weakest link of the building and finally the clinching evidence of Nova Scott bank vacating most of its gold deposits from the building premises   Even the bomb disposal sniffer dogs were taken off duty in such a highly security zone and guess who was incharge of the security of the buildings Morgan Bush  

What are the primary reasons attributed to pulling down the WTC according to conspirator theory specialists : a)  &nb sp;  Major war was no where, armament industry was on brink of collapse due to accumulated weaponryb)  &n bsp; Army was getting rusted and turning a liability in the absence of real time war maneuversc)   &nbs p; Bush wanted to avenge Iraqi snob on senior Bush during Kuwait liberation and install the masonry influence back in Iraq d)    Fertile Ground for undertaking exercise in Afghanistan for military personnel   Capturing Osama was only secondary target e)   &nbs p; Repaying the election sponsors and creating environs for more war fare   

Obviously the benefits for the American economy are multifarious:

1)  Disposal of huge cache of arms and ammunitions which were getting outdated 

2)  Increase in price of crude oil which was in the band of 25 to 35 $ band 

3)  Milking the financial institutions, like Insurance, Investment bankers etc 

4)  Establishing the US hegemony in uni-polar world 

5)  Rebuilding process of the destroyed edifice and natural disasters   

Hats off  to the brilliant strategists and discovery of the real logic behind the WTC conspiracy  

One will never get to know the real truth unless we are willing to dig deep   I am still wondering whether what we have seen is a brilliant Hollywood masterpiece script or economic compulsion   Should we grieve for the 2974 lives that were lost due to terrorist attacks or martyrs? for the capitalists cause   

conspiracy theory

US President Barack Obama announced on May 2 that the world's most wanted terrorist, Osama bin Laden, was killed in a pre-dawn helicopter-borne secret operation in a house just yards from Pakistan's Military Academy in Abbottabad town.

Pakistani officials claim that members of Pakistan's intelligence service, the ISI, were on site in Abbottabad during the operation. However, a US senior administration officer said that the Obama administration did not share intelligence information gathered with any country including Pakistan for security reasons. Only a small group of people within the US government knew about the operation at the time.

Osama's death seems to carry a lot of conspiracy theories, especially coming at a time when Obama's presidential approval ratings have dropped drastically and the ties between USA and Pakistan seemed to be strained.

Could Osama's death be a coincidence or is it a conspiracy from either US or Pakistan? After all, Osama's death is a win-win situation for both.

Is it possible that the Obama government is trying to win back the people's love and confidence, so that he gets elected for the second time around? This question comes to mind after one thinks of how George W Bush was re-elected after the 9/11 tragedy redefined America's outlook towards him.

When Osama was harboured by Afghanistan, US bombarded Afghan leaving no stone unturned. So when it comes to Intelligence reports claiming, for weeks now, that Osama bin Laden is in fact hiding in Pakistan, why was no Agfhan-like action taken? Secret operations do take a long time and do require a lot of planning (agreed) but America's change in procedure seems a little shaky. Were Obama and his administration too worried about how the world would react if they did the same in Pakistan? If so, why didn't Obama stop and think before carrying out the recent attacks on Libya?

Another point going against the US is the sudden sea burial of Osama's body. Islam religion does state that the dead should be buried soon, but if Benazir Bhutto's body could be kept for 3 days, why was the same not done for Osama? Why wasn't his body kept long enough for the world to see and be comforted by the fact that the face of terror was indeed no more?

This could also be Pakistan's way of strengthening ties with US by offering the Osama on a platter.

In recent days, it has been noted that, USA has slammed the Pakistan Intelligence agency, ISI, for harbouring high profile terrorists and has also considered the agency as much of a threat as the Al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

What is a cause for speculation, after the intelligence reports from US, is that Pakistan claims to have not known anything on the where about of bin Laden, while he was living in a specially-built mansion just 60 kms from the Pakistan capital. Also, Osama's 'hideaway', is in an area where high profile Pakistani officials live. How is it that no one knew Osama, the face feared by many and known by all, was residing in their midst?

Another question raised against Pakistan, is that with such a highly important operation going on by American troops, how is it that Pakistan did not notice anything?

With so much speculation, it could be possible that Pakistan did in fact harbour Osama bin Laden until they noticed that the world, or more importantly, USA was slowly going against them and it was high time they did something to regain US' trust.

When it comes to Osama Bin Laden, anything under the sun seems possible. There were hints from President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in December 2001 saying that Osama was dead. Then again in January 2002, President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan announced that bin Laden was suffering with kidney disease and was most probably dead. As early as July of 2002, even the FBI's counter terrorism chief was quoted as saying; Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead.

With so much speculation going on, about Osama's life or death, for so many years, one cannot help but stop and think, is the announcement made by Barack Obama true or not? DNA reports do confirm that it was actually Osama who was shot in the US led operation, and there are pictures to back Obama's announcement. So, yes, Osama bin Laden, the face of terror, is actually dead. But, that doesn't stop one from speculation, does it?

ack : original post link 

http://ibnlive.in.com/blogs/gillianmariehooper/2946/62385/osamas-death-conspiracy-or-coincidence.html

Why They Killed Osama bin Laden Now ?

This article is written by Nithin Pai, which is being reproduced along with link........please read on.




You might remember a Shekhar Suman gag on Zee TV's Movers and Shakers several years ago: An angry George W Bush announces that the United States will bomb the place where Osama bin Laden is found to be hiding

Hearing this, Vajpayee looks under his bed, pauses, and with a characteristic flick of his wrist says: "Thank God! He isn't here!"

Over in Rawalpindi, General Musharraf looks under his bed, sighs in relief, and says: "Thank God! He is still here!"

Shekhar Suman, more than most Western analysts, got the plot right. Keeping Osama bin Laden out of Washington's hands was vital in order to prevent having to publicly deal with revelations of how the Pakistani military-jihadi complex not only was connected with al-Qaeda, but might also have been involved in the conspiracy behind the 9/11 attacks.

Moreover, when the Pakistani military leadership was getting paid hundreds of millions of dollars per year to hunt bin Laden down, it made little sense to give him up quickly. As early as October 2001, a month after 9/11, wags in Islamabad coined the phrase  "al-Faida" (the profit) in anticipation of the rewards Pakistan would reap for joining the war on terror that it had played a part in creating. Pakistan was in an international doghouse at that time. Its economy was crumbling under the weight of sections imposed by the international community for having carried out nuclear tests in 1998. Its government, then under General Musharraf's military dictatorship, was seen as odious, not least for supporting the original Taliban regime in Kabul. It was barely surviving on Saudi largesse until September 2001, when General Musharraf's ditching of one set of allies for another changed his country's fortunes -- from being nearly toast, Pakistan was the toast.

Just how much was the al-Faida worth? According to the data compiled by K Alan Kronstadt, of the US Congressional Research Service, between 2002 and 2010, US direct overt aid and military reimbursements to Pakistan amounted to $19.6 billion, of which $13.3 billion was for security-related heads. Obviously, if there is "direct, overt" aid, there is likely to be "indirect, covert" aid. There is also the money from other countries and loans from the IMF. Because military jihadi complex dominates the Pakistani political economy, it is the primary beneficiary of this largesse. Between 2002 and 2008, my estimate suggests that the business of shipping US and NATO containers from Karachi to Kabul alone made $500m per year for the military establishment and $300m per year for the militant groups. Why would they want the gravy train to stop?

They wouldn't, but the Obama administration had other ideas. It made three changes that caused the Pakistani military establishment to redo its sums. First, the Kerry-Lugar-Berman legislation made it harder for the military to capture the funds. It also came with more strings attached. Second, the Obama administration increased the number of drone strikes against targets in Pakistan, while increasing pressure on the Pakistani army to go after the taliban groups in its tribal areas. Finally, by indicating a timeline for withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, Washington triggered the endgame.

With the Obama adminstration taking a harder line on the Pakistani army, the al-Faida from the war against al-Qaeda began to be less attractive. At the same time, with a US withdrawal in sight, Afghanistan began to look more attractive as a prize. For General Kayani to stand a chance for claiming this prize, it is necessary for President Obama to prevail over other members of his administration and get US troops out earlier.

Playing the bin Laden card is a brilliant way to achieve this outcome. Although US officials claim they did it without Pakistan's knowledge or permission, it is hard to believe he could be found without the Pakistani military establishment permitting it.

Either way, bin Laden's elimination provides the right political cover for President Obama to declare victory and order his troops out of Afghanistan. Once withdrawal starts, President Obama will be politically dependent on General Kayani to ensure that it takes place in a manner that doesn't damage his re-election prospects. Expect the latter to use the leverage to ensure that the military-jihadi complex gets its proxies into the government in Kabul.

My blog reference,  "the United States is unlikely to punish Pakistan for the decade of duplicity, subterfuge and violence that consumed innumerable lives and astounding amounts of money." President Obama will not ask why Osama bin Laden was living it up in Abbottabad, a bus stop away from the Pakistan Military Academy, and not in a cave somewhere in Waziristan. You won't find Washington too interested in confronting General Kayani on when bin Laden moved in there and why his presence went undetected for so long.

Rather, Washington will seek plausible reassurances that after it leaves, Afghanistan will not play host to terrorists targeting the United States. It will place some anti-Taliban and anti-Pakistan Afghans into positions of power in Kabul to balance Pakistan's proxies. It might retain some troops and drones in Afghanistan just in case it needs to use a stick. That apart, it will accede to Pakistani demands that Kabul be made over to a pro-Pakistani regime.

In time, the Pakistani military-jihadi complex will seek to reconquer Afghanistan (called "gaining strategic depth") with China's support or connivance.

We are staring at a return of the 1990s. This is a bad outcome for Afghans, Pakistanis and Indians. The military-jihadi complex will gain in strength. Pakistan's civilian government will be more powerless. It will only be a facade with which to seek foreign assistance. It will also be the whipping boy, blamed for the worsening state of Pakistan. Hundreds of thousands of triumphant militants will need to be given new targets. Compared to the early 1990s, it is far more difficult today---strategically and operationally---to push them across into India. Yet, the interests of the military-jihadi complex and the absence of a miracle job-machine will pose a serious threat to India's national security. We may be, at best, two summers away from an escalation of the proxy war in Kashmir and elsewhere.

Nitin Pai is founder & fellow for geopolitics at the Takshila institute and editor of Pragati - The Indian National Interest Review, a publication on strategic affairs, public policy and governance. He blogs at The Acorn and is active on Twitter too.

.http://in.news.yahoo.com/blogs/opinions/why-killed-osama-bin-laden-now-051958498.html

OSAMA DEAD AND BURIED @ SEA

Now that Osama is dead and the so called justice is finally delivered ?  But his body has been literally fed to the sharks and other sea creatures, ensuring that his DNA spreads in the ocean.  Now I would think twice before consuming any sea food for next one year from the Arabian Sea Lolz.  Lest Osama’s genes enters my body to change my mindset.

The question according to conspiracy theorists are plenty surrounding the death of Osama but we shall limit to only 5 for sake of posterity.:

1. The timing of the death of  Osama and its announcement to the world
2. Why was photograph or video of the action was not revealed to the world ?
3. No post mortem was carried out on Osama, which is standard medical procedure ?
4. The custody of the family members have been taken by Pakistanis ?
5. Does it signal that US is preparing to withdraw from Afghanistan ?

Primarily if  Osama was under treatment for a long a time for kidney or lever disease, he would have been at the brink of  natural death by now.  Does it signify that he was tacitly bartered for a gain by the establishment of the land.  To bury a dead man in Abbotabad would have been a huge embarrassment for rulers, so the need for anonymous exit arose.

Conspiracy theorists argue that the timing of  elimination of  Osama seems to have coincided with the falling ratings of  Obama in US and preparation for the election campaign next year.  So naturally some brownie points is gained by eliminating Osama.

Only one  distorted picture emerged of  Osama was released to the world as a disturbing picture to the world by Pakistan Media.   This too was later denied as a fake by the media, since the nostril did  not tally with original features of Osama.  There was no action video of such a major covert campaign, which was in the offing from August 2010, which is stranger than fiction.  Maybe we will see light of  pictures and videos taken after a few days to keep the heroics alive of killing the no 1 enemy of civilization.

Why Osama’s body was buried in the Arabian sea, without a post mortem is a big surprise ?  Post mortem would have definitely revealed what was the cause of  death of the dreaded man medically.  The missing link was denied to the world from the evidence point of view.  I only hope this major proof will eventually be produced before the world for sake of justice delivered theory.

It is quite normal that the fugitives and family members should have been taken into custody by the invading forces like in the Entbee operations to be produced as a proof in front of the world.  But they were left behind with host country to handle the limelight or erase the trace of  huge terrorist family. 

In all probability Osama’s death or elimination from planet earth signals a win win situation for the sagging ratings , need for getting rid of liability and paving way for withdrawl from the strife torn territory of  Afghanistan for US. 

After a decade all speculations on whereabouts of OSAMA will come to rest, but his safe haden in Abbotabad from 2005 will be a museum for triumph of justice.  Conspiracy theorists should attempt to unravel the real reason behind the quick disposal of the body of  most wanted terrorist on earth, till than I will dread to consume seafood from the Arabian sea.

Disclaimer : This article is meant for limited circulation and does not cast any aspersion on any establishment, nor promoting any disharmony, but is just a quest of truth in the face of  disinformation galore.  The stunned silence of the establishment is even more intriguing for the sub-continent.  Let us bury the terror in our minds along with elimination of OSAMA.